Machinepower

Machinepower Index / Dossiers / Canada

Rank 7 of 50 · Tier 2

Rank 3–8 across the scoring rules tested. How this is tested

Canada

Specialist Power — For nations among the world's best at something the frontier needs but could find elsewhere: keep earning the lead before others catch up, and trade expertise for access.

Score6.53
Potential6.97
Bottleneck cost−0.43
Weakest cell: Frontier Model Output at 5.2 Binding layer: Weights Since the October fix: No change logged Edition: Q4 2026 · updated October 2026

How the Score, Potential and bottleneck cost are worked out: methodology.

The three layers

WattsMaterial power
6.1 / 10

Energy, grids, data centres and silicon — the physical capacity to run models at scale.

Compute tracked by Epoch AI: Canada controls 1,300 H100-equivalents, wherever the sites are; has 2,800 on its soil with the owner not reported. Hosted compute is shown, not scored.

WeightsIntelligence power · holds the weakest cell
7.0 / 10

Models, alignment capability, standards influence and the talent that produces them.

WillPolitical power
7.8 / 10

The capacity to wire AI into the state and the economy while holding public consent.

Where the score comes from

LayerSub-dimensionBasisScore
WattsPlanning & PermittingAssessed7.2
Firm Power CapacityDataset6.4
Sovereign ComputeDataset5.4
Hardware & Silicon AccessDataset5.3
WeightsFrontier Model OutputAssessed5.2
Alignment CapabilityAssessed8.0
Regulatory StandingDataset7.7
Talent DensityDataset7.0
WillPolicy CapacityDataset9.3
Public Sector AdoptionDataset7.9
Workforce TransitionDataset8.7
Public TrustDataset Sources differ5.2

Assessed marks a measurement we judged rather than took from a dataset: 3 of the 12 here.

Sources differ marks a cell where two sources disagree by more than a point. Public Trust: Ipsos and Melbourne/KPMG differ by more than a point (4.4 against 5.4); the cell is their average.

Sources

Ipsos AI Monitor 2026April 2026
Public Trust in AI
34% say AI products have more benefits than drawbacks

Share of adults agreeing that products and services using AI have more benefits than drawbacks; the Index scores public trust as 1 + share ÷ 10. Survey of 23,532 adults across 32 countries, March to April 2026.

View source →
CohereJune 2026
Frontier models (assessed)
5.2/10, assessed

Toronto-based Cohere ships near-frontier enterprise models: Command A, the open-weight Command A+ (May 2026) and North Mini Code (June 2026). In April 2026 it agreed to merge with Germany's Aleph Alpha, with both governments' support, keeping the combined company in Toronto.

View source →
ISED CanadaJune 2026
Sovereign AI Compute Strategy
CAD $2B programme

Canada's Sovereign AI Compute Strategy funds domestic compute (AI Compute Challenge, public supercomputing, AI Compute Access Fund); the national 'AI for All' strategy launched June 2026.

View source →
Epoch AIJuly 2026
Enterprise Sovereign Foundation Models
Cohere Command series

Cohere's Command models remain Canada's flagship sovereign enterprise foundation series in Epoch's continuously updated database.

View source →
Stanford AI Index 2026April 2026
Research Talent Base
29.6% of AI researchers female

The 2026 AI Index records 29.6% of Canadian AI researchers as female, among the highest shares measured. Canada sustains elite research density through Mila, the Vector Institute and Amii, though talent migration to US labs remains the structural constraint.

View source →
IMF2023 data, published June 2024
AI Preparedness Index: human capital and labour market policies
0.175 of a possible 0.25 · 8.7/10 in the Index

Used for the workforce measurement. The IMF combines schooling, pay, labour mobility and active labour-market policies; the Index rescales it so the weakest of 173 economies scores 0 and the strongest 10.

View source →
World BankDecember 2025
Business Ready 2025: business location and utility services
Business location 61.6/100 · utility services 87.6/100

A cross-check for planning and permitting, which stays assessed: it scores building permits and electricity connections for ordinary firms, not grid-scale connections for data centres.

View source →
CSET Emerging Technology ObservatoryAugust 2026
AI safety research, 2019–2024
1,486 articles (3% of the world's) · 39.8 citations per article

A cross-check for alignment, which stays assessed. The Research Almanac counts English-language research only, so it understates Japanese, Korean and Chinese work.

View source →
Ember2025
Firm generating capacity
132 GW (2025)

Fossil, nuclear, hydro and other dispatchable plant; averaged with generation for firm power.

View source →
GitHub Innovation Graph; Oxford Insights2026
Developer base
4.0 million developers

Second source for talent, averaged with Stanford's count.

View source →
University of Melbourne; KPMGJanuary 2025
Trust in AI at work
41% trust AI at work

Second source for public trust, averaged with Ipsos.

View source →
Oxford InsightsMay 2026
Policy capacity
92/100

Feeds policy capacity.

View source →
Stanford AI Index 2026April 2026
Private AI investment, 2025 (shown, not scored)
$4.3bn

Capital is shown beside the Score, not scored.

View source →
Public First, AI Global 20262026
Consent to build data centres
45% want more built, 21% fewer

Half of public trust: support for building more data centres, scored as 1 + share ÷ 10 and averaged with trust in AI.

View source →

Bottlenecks

These hold Canada below its Potential. Its two lowest scores cost it the most: frontier model output at 5.2 (part of Weights) and public trust at 5.2 (part of Will).

Weights (Intelligence)Frontier Model Output

Assessment

Canada is a research powerhouse, home to the pioneers of deep learning. Its challenge is preventing "brain drain" to the US and translating its academic lead into industrial machinepower.

The art of the possible

Canada invented much of modern deep learning; its upside is keeping what it creates. Sovereign compute investment plus retention incentives for its research diaspora would let hydro-rich Quebec and its world-class labs compound at home instead of in California.

Strategic play — Specialist Power

Keep what it invents: sovereign compute on Quebec hydro and retention incentives for the research diaspora, so the labs the field still runs on compound at home rather than in California, and Canada becomes a trusted second supplier of allied compute instead of a talent pipeline to someone else's.

Leverage — the nearest position. No chokepoint. Its leverage is softer: hydro and uranium for firm power, and a research lineage the field still runs on. The realistic position is trusted second supplier of allied compute — valuable, but nobody needs a licence to leave.

Open Canada in the live Index → — every source behind every number, and the comparison tool.