Machinepower Index / Dossiers / Switzerland

Rank 16 of 25 · Tier 3

Switzerland

Specialist Power — Dominate one narrow, world-class layer the giants cannot easily replace, instead of contesting the whole stack.

Score5.57
Potential6.27
Bottleneck cost−0.69
Weakest cell: Firm Power Capacity at 3.6 Binding layer: Watts Direction: Improving Edition: Q3 2026

Score comes from the twelve measurements beneath the three layers. A nation needs all of them at once — world-class models are no use on a grid that cannot power them — so one weak measurement pulls the Score down instead of being averaged away. Potential is the plain average of the three layers. The gap between the two is what being lopsided costs: nothing if a nation is evenly built, more the further its strengths and weaknesses sit apart. The exact formula is on the methodology page.

The three layers

WattsMaterial power · holds the weakest cell
5.0 / 10

Energy, grids, data centres and silicon — the physical capacity to run models at scale.

WeightsIntelligence power
6.8 / 10

Models, alignment capability, standards influence and the talent that produces them.

WillPolitical power
7.0 / 10

The capacity to wire AI into the state and the economy while holding public consent.

Where the score comes from

Each layer is the plain average of its four measurements. The Score uses those twelve measurements directly rather than the three averages, because averaging hides things: a 10 next to a 3 comes out as a forgettable 6.5, and you lose both facts. Every measurement is scored 0–10 and marked to show where the number came from.

LayerSub-dimensionBasisScore
WattsPlanning & PermittingAssessed5.0
Firm Power CapacityDataset3.6
Sovereign ComputeDataset6.7
Hardware & Silicon AccessDataset4.7
WeightsFrontier Model OutputAssessed4.0
Alignment CapabilityAssessed6.5
Regulatory StandingDataset8.9
Talent DensityAssessed7.8
WillState ProcurementAssessed7.5
Public Sector AdoptionDataset7.4
Workforce TransitionAssessed7.6
Public TrustDataset5.5

Dataset means the number comes straight from a published source. Assessed means we judged it ourselves, because no dataset measures that thing cleanly — 6 of the 12 here, and 116 of 312 across the Index. The CSV export flags them too.

Sources

Every source below was published within the last 12 months. These are the main ones behind Switzerland's profile. The full list, and the rule on how recent a source has to be, are on the methodology page.

TOP500.orgJune 2026
High-Performance Compute Capacity
Alps (CSCS) — 434.9 PF (#10 global)

Alps at CSCS Lugano is the tenth-fastest system on Earth on the June 2026 list; Switzerland's ~450 PF aggregate is remarkable for a nine-million-person state.

View source →
Oxford Insights GAIRI 2025January 2026
Government AI Readiness
Governance pillar 89.20/100 · rank 26 overall

The validated January 2026 report rates Swiss governance capacity at 89.20/100, with public-sector adoption at 73.93.

View source →
Ipsos AI Monitor 2025June 2025
Public Trust in AI
45% say benefits outweigh drawbacks

In Ipsos's 30-country 2025 wave (fielded March–April 2025), the most recent to cover Switzerland, 45% of Swiss respondents agreed AI products and services have more benefits than drawbacks — among the more sceptical publics surveyed.

View source →

Bottlenecks

These hold Switzerland below its Potential. Its two lowest scores cost it the most: firm power capacity at 3.6 (part of Watts) and frontier model output at 4.0 (part of Weights).

Watts (Material)Firm Power Capacity

Assessment

The Alps machine at CSCS is a top-ten system on Earth and Apertus is among Europe's most credible sovereign open models — a remarkable intelligence layer for nine million people. But Switzerland runs it all on 65 TWh and a public among the most AI-sceptical surveyed (45%). Precision, not scale, is the Swiss condition.

The art of the possible

Switzerland cannot out-build anyone; it can out-trust everyone. The play is to become the neutral ground of the AI age — sovereign evaluation, model auditing and data escrow for states that trust neither Washington nor Beijing. The Geneva of weights, priced accordingly.

Strategic play — Specialist Power

Dominate one narrow, world-class layer the giants cannot easily replace, instead of contesting the whole stack.

The play is editorial, not scored: it names the game Switzerland's measured position supports. Eight plays run across the Index — Total Sovereignty, Strategic Autonomy, Chokepoint Leverage, Diffusion Advantage, Compute Rentier, Specialist Power, Sovereign Capital and Siege Autarky.

Open Switzerland in the live Index → — every source behind every number, the comparison tool and the CSV export.