Machinepower

Machinepower Index / Dossiers / Ukraine

Rank 41 of 50 · Tier 3

Rank 34–49 across the scoring rules tested. How this is tested

Ukraine

Specialist Power — For nations among the world's best at something the frontier needs but could find elsewhere: keep earning the lead before others catch up, and trade expertise for access.

Score3.79
Potential5.60
Bottleneck cost−1.81
Weakest cell: Sovereign Compute at 2.0 Binding layer: Watts Since the October fix: No change logged Edition: Q4 2026 · updated October 2026

How the Score, Potential and bottleneck cost are worked out: methodology.

The three layers

WattsMaterial power · holds the weakest cell
3.6 / 10

Energy, grids, data centres and silicon — the physical capacity to run models at scale.

Epoch AI records no large AI clusters or data centres here yet.

WeightsIntelligence power
5.5 / 10

Models, alignment capability, standards influence and the talent that produces them.

WillPolitical power
7.7 / 10

The capacity to wire AI into the state and the economy while holding public consent.

Where the score comes from

LayerSub-dimensionBasisScore
WattsPlanning & PermittingAssessed7.0
Firm Power CapacityDataset2.8
Sovereign ComputeAssessed2.0
Hardware & Silicon AccessAssessed2.5
WeightsFrontier Model OutputAssessed3.0
Alignment CapabilityAssessed4.0
Regulatory StandingDataset8.3
Talent DensityDataset6.8
WillPolicy CapacityDataset7.4
Public Sector AdoptionDataset8.0
Workforce TransitionDataset7.0
Public TrustAssessed8.4

Assessed marks a measurement we judged rather than took from a dataset: 6 of the 12 here.

Sources

Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine; KyivstarJune 2026
Sovereign compute (assessed)
2.0/10, assessed

The state AI Factory starts with four GPU nodes, due by June 2026, and the national LLM is trained on a planned cluster of about 64 Nvidia GPUs bought by Kyivstar. A sovereign AI data centre exists only as a June 2026 memorandum.

View source →
Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine2026
Hardware & silicon access (assessed)
2.5/10, assessed

Ukraine has no domestic chip fabrication or lithography; its accelerators arrive through allied supply, as the AI Factory's Nvidia hardware shows.

View source →
IEAFebruary 2026
Available Dispatchable Generating Capacity
~11.5 GW available (Feb 2026)

Available dispatchable capacity fell to roughly 11.5 GW by February 2026, against installed capacity of about 55 GW before the invasion. This is the lowest firm-power position in the Index, and it is the result of sustained strikes on generation rather than of any policy choice.

View source →
Oxford InsightsMarch 2026
Government AI Readiness Index 2025
41st of 195 governments

Ukraine rose from 54th to 41st in a single year. Its own Ministry of Digital Transformation reported the rank as 40th; the figure used here follows Oxford Insights' published account rather than the government's.

View source →
Oxford InsightsMarch 2026
Public Sector AI Adoption
24M+ Diia users; 77 in-app services

The Diia ecosystem passed 24 million users, with 77 services in the app and more than 150 on the portal. Diia.AI, added in September 2025, delivers government services inside a chat interface rather than only answering questions about them.

View source →
Oxford Insights / Brave1March 2026
Defence AI Procurement
300+ AI innovations registered; 70+ deployed

More than 300 AI-based innovations are registered with the Brave1 defence-tech cluster and over 70 AI and computer-vision systems are in use by units at the front. Certification runs in months rather than the multi-year cycles typical of allied defence procurement.

View source →
Oxford Insights / Diia.CityMarch 2026
AI Firm & Talent Density
3,800 IT firms; ~400 AI companies

3,800 IT companies joined the Diia.City tax regime after 2022, including roughly 200 civilian AI firms — among them Grammarly and Respeecher — and about 200 more building defence AI. Drone manufacturers went from 7 before the war to more than 500.

View source →
Ministry of Defence of UkraineAugust 2026
Battlefield AI Training Data
5M annotated frames; 100,000+ feeds/month

Avengers Labs holds roughly 5 million annotated battlefield frames, largely drawn from the DELTA combat system. Models trained on it process more than 100,000 drone video streams a month and identify about 70% of targets in real time. Access is licensed by the Ministry under Cabinet of Ministers Resolution No. 310.

View source →
IMF2023 data, published June 2024
AI Preparedness Index: human capital and labour market policies
0.146 of a possible 0.25 · 7.0/10 in the Index

Used for the workforce measurement. The IMF combines schooling, pay, labour mobility and active labour-market policies; the Index rescales it so the weakest of 173 economies scores 0 and the strongest 10.

View source →
Oxford InsightsMay 2026
Policy capacity
74/100

Feeds policy capacity.

View source →

On the register — an exclusive asset

Ukraine holds something others pay to reach but could live without: an exclusive asset, the rung below a chokepoint. See the whole chain.

01Has restricted access What Ukraine controls
Battlefield AI training data
Who supplies it
One country, one war, five years of it
Why it matters

Ukraine's Ministry of Defence runs Avengers Labs, a platform built around an annotated dataset of 5 million battlefield frames, most of it drawn from the DELTA combat system. The sensors capture what Ukrainian forces face: tanks, artillery, air defence systems, infantry, and aerial targets including Russian-operated Shahed drones and reconnaissance UAVs. The Ministry states that a dataset of comparable scale and quality is virtually impossible for private companies to build. Models trained on it already run inside DELTA, processing more than 100,000 drone video streams a month and detecting 70% of enemy targets in real time. Access is licensed by the Ministry under Cabinet of Ministers Resolution No. 310 of March 2026, which screens applicants and excludes anyone with ownership, business or sanctions ties to Russia. On 24 August 2026 Kyiv gave Britain first access as a partner country and left everyone else waiting. Weaker on dominance than the hardware entries — Russia holds the mirror image of the same war and other militaries hold their own combat data — but stronger on the lever, which is a working licensing regime rather than a power merely available.

Ministry of Defence of Ukraine →

Bottlenecks

These hold Ukraine below its Potential. Its two lowest scores cost it the most: sovereign compute at 2.0 (part of Watts) and hardware & silicon access at 2.5 (part of Watts).

Watts (Material)Sovereign Compute

Assessment

Ukraine has the widest spread in the Index: a Will score level with the United States and China, on the lowest firm power of any nation. Diia reaches 24 million people; Brave1 certifies battlefield AI in months. But generating capacity has fallen to roughly 11.5 GW from about 55 GW before the invasion. What Ukraine holds is a different kind of power from the kind the Index measures.

The art of the possible

Ukraine already owns what others cannot manufacture: five million annotated frames of real combat, licensed by its own Ministry of Defence. The gain is not in chasing compute it cannot power, but in turning that licence into a durable export while allied capital rebuilds firm generation.

Strategic play — Specialist Power

Turn battlefield AI into a durable export: license the combat data and Brave1-certified systems to allies on terms that outlast the war, and leave compute it cannot yet power to partners while allied capital rebuilds firm generation.

Leverage — the nearest position. On the register as an exclusive asset rather than a chokepoint: five million annotated frames of real combat, licensed by its Ministry of Defence and opened to Britain first. Others pay to reach it but could live without it, and Russia holds its own record of the same war. Still the proof that a position can be built, under bombardment, by the lowest-scored nation in the table.

Open Ukraine in the live Index → — every source behind every number, and the comparison tool.